Do Your Job
You may be the
boss, but how do you know I’m doing my job?
Since I am a New Englander, it is no surprise that I am going
to use a New England example to make a distinction between a democracy and a republic. New England Town Meetings are democracy at its
purest. Everyone who is a resident of
the town can vote at a Town Meeting. However
the business of the town is mundane, boring, and time consuming. Even though everyone can go to town meetings
not everyone wants to, has the time to, or the interest to, participate in town meetings
. Thus in a town with thousands of eligible
voters, only a few hundred might participate in a town meeting, and those that do participate may have a bias for certain actions and are not representative of those who do
not attend. Thus while it is a pure democracy,
it requires a commitment of time that may be unrealistic.
A less biased and less time consuming method is to give your proxy to a town meeting member who will represent you, i.e. a republic. Then that person can act in your place and this should reflect your biases, not an unknown bias. Then you merely have to judge that the person representing you truthfully represents your views.. Whether that representative is for a town meeting, a city council, a state legislature, Congress, etc., those proxies are chosen in an election.
The problem then becomes choosing someone to represent you as an individual while recognizing that you as an individual still retain sovereignty of a democracy. This form of government where the sovereign is the group of individuals but those individuals chose representatives to vote/act for them is called a republic. It is not an accident that the earliest political party of Thomas Jefferson called itself Democrat-Republican and not until did later did it drop the Republican part of its name. Thus when a new political party formed in the 1850s, the name Republican was available and became the name of those who opposed the expansion of slavery and included no taxation Whigs who opposed the expansion of slavery into federal territory and anti-immigrant Know Nothings who opposed the same. While Republicans eventually came to oppose all forms of slavery, not just merely its expansion, that did not occur until after the Civil War, by which time the issue of slavery versus the retention of power became the distinguishing attribute in the Republican Party.
Fast forward to today, The descendants of no-tax Whigs and anti-immigrant Know-Nothings have taken over the Republican Party and intimidated, or retaliated against, all those who merely opposed the expansion of slavery. The Freedom Caucus/Tea Party/MAGA calls those who oppose them Republicans in Name Only, RINOs. In fact it is they who are rINOs , opposed to a republic.
Your job involves three things in order of importance: Execution, Foresting and Communication. The problem is that the ability to do our job is primarily judged by others on how well our can communicate. But that communication can be used to lie.
In republics you desire is to find someone who would act like you, forecast like you, and would communicate like you. In other words, you want someone to be winning, certain, and true. But while you can determine whether someone is winning, if someone is less than the absolute you can only be 99.9999..% certain . Something can be 100% certainly true or 100% certainly false. We can view at most 5/6 of the absolute. Humans can only determine 91.28% of the truth under the best of circumstances.
The issue is NOT voting for someone to represent you unless you
are certain that person is telling you the truth. When faced with two choices: candidate one who has a
grade of A in execution, a Grade of B in forecasting and a grade of C in communication,
versus another individual who has a grade of execution of F, a grade of forecasting of F, but a grade of communications
of A. If you can chose only on the basis
of communication then the second choice would win. If you choose on the composite score,
then you would choose candidate one to represent you. So in the last election, how did you vote? For the best communicator? or the best representative? They are not the same. The challenge is to judge not only how they
have done the job, but also how they will do their job in the future to represent
you, but you only have their word and their past performance on which to judge
that. In this case the directive becomes not “I'm the boss, get back to work.”
but “I’m the boss, do I believe that you can do my job.”