Pick up my guitar and
play
Just like yesterday
Then I'll get on my knees and pray
We don't get fooled again.
Fool me once shame on
you. Fool me twice shame on me.
Arthur Laffer and Stephen
Moore had the nerve to publish an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal on
August 13, 2021 with the subtitle “Forty years after the 1981 tax cuts, America
needs to relearn the lessons of the supply-side revolution.” Really? Really? I hope that we don't have to relearn anything, that we have wised up, learned our lessons well, and will never forget.
In 1981 America embarked on an economic experiment by changing
its tax code to lower taxes, especially for upper incomes, and cut government spending
on common resources. It was sold as a
supply side stimulus, which was an alternative to a Keynesian demand side stimulus.
We were told that those increases to the investment class would trickle down to
benefit all through increased growth.
After 40 years, the growth has been much lower than the period
before those tax cuts. Very little has trickled down. In fact the US has been one of only
two countries, the other being the United Kingdom, where difference
between mean and median income increased since the 1980s. The United Kingdom wised up and stopped the destructive
practices of Margaret Thatcher and has at least reached stability, but the US experiment
has continued to this day.
Government spending
increases common resources and regulates those common resources so that we won’t have
a Tragedy of the Commons. Stimulating labor may increase production. What was sold as supply side stimulus was
really only an investment stimulus. What
is particularly ironic is that the reason to adopt these draconian measures was
“stagflation” that in retrospect was most probably caused by the Nixon Shock of
1971. So Republican Ronald Reagan “saved” the US from the problem caused by Republican Richard
Nixon. Talk about killing your parents and
appealing for mercy because you are now an orphan.
It took Sam Brownback only five years to ruin the economy of Kansas with "supply side" economics, so there
is some small advantage that voodoo economics was not totally embraced and it
could have been worse. But we won’t get
fooled again.
No comments:
Post a Comment