Here Comes the
Judge
Yeah, life! You
son-of-a-gun you
Come November, election time
You vote your way, I'll vote mine
'Cause there's a tie, and the money gets spent
So how are you
voting this November?
An election is about policy AND trust.
A voter may disagree on policy, but pick the candidate who is more trustworthy.
This is because while the election is between two political parties. and we are
in a two party system because of Duverger’s Law, a contest, such as an
election, should have three not just two outcomes. Those outcomes are win, loss and tie, not just win and loss. But
if we only have only two candidates, how can we make choices and predictions?
The answer is in Games Theory. The outcomes are actually:
1) Policy 1/Trust;
2) Policy 1/Don’t Trust;
3) Policy 2/Trust; AND
4) Policy 2/Don’t Trust.
Then there are four choices. A tie can
then be replaced by 2)
Policy 1/Don’t Trust AND 4) Policy 2/Don’t Trust. Then a voter can choose among
three outcomes. Let’s say that Policy 1 is Democratic and Policy 2 is
Republican. Let’s also say that Democratic policies are favored by 45% and
Republican policies are favored by 55%. If only policies are considered in
elections then the outcome is clear and the Republican candidate would win.. But let’s also say that the Democratic
candidate is trusted by 60% and the Republican candidate is trusted by 40%. On
this basis the Democratic candidate would win. But Democratic voters will probably vote for the Democratic
candidate regardless of trust, and Republican voters will probably vote for the
Republican candidate regardless of trust. The election will be decided by the
swing, independent, unaffiliated voters
that should be 1/3 of the electorate. They will pick and choose on
policy AND trust. A scientist
might say that a win is a true positive, a loss is a true negative and a tie is
either a false positive or a false negative.
Let’s say that the Democratic candidate who
is trusted is Kamala Harris. Let’s say that a Democratic candidate who is not
trusted is Krysten Sinema. Let’s say that a Republican candidate who is trusted
is Mike Pence (I am tempted to say Adam Kinzinger, but he endorsed Harris or
Nikki Haley, but she endorsed Trump). Let’s the Republican candidate who is Not Trusted is Donald Trump. But only Harris and
Trump are on the ballot.
Independents should equally weight trust AND policy. The cross product of trust and policy for Kamala Harris is (45% * 60%= 27%). The cross product for Donald Trump is (55% * 40%=22%). Assuming that Republican voters are 1/3 of the electorate and Democratic Voters are 1/3 of the electorate, the win among the unaffiliated voters will make Harris the preferred candidate. The closest analog in my lifetime is the election of LBJ vs Goldwater. Goldwater did not lose based on swing voters favoring LBJ’s policies, but because those voters did not trust Goldwater. History may not repeat itself but it sure does rhyme.
Which is why Harris should NOT campaign on policy. As she is doing, she should ignore policy and campaign on trust. History for $100? Who will win this election? IMHO, Harris if she continues to campaign on trust.
No comments:
Post a Comment