Common As
Muck
You're not
Bridget Bardot, I'm not Jack Palance.
I'm not Shirley Temple by any circumstance,
Or Fred Astaire
We're as
common as muck.
Bonne chance, viel glück, good luck
Where bold is beautiful, we don't give a damn
Luvva duck, we're as common as muck.
Maybe common
sense isn’t very common.
We assume our leaders will have common sense. Leaders on average do approximate the range variable, s, the tolerance, aka the Standard Deviation, of the absolute. In fact they match it better than most other ages of life in a group. But those who should be leaders are only 60% of the group. The Voters and Advisors do better at matching the Absolute.
Even leaders can’t perceive the location variable, μ, of the absolute. They pale besides
the Nash Equilibrium, whose followers perceive more of the absolute than is actually
there. A Nash Equilibrium acts like the Absolute has a median/mean/location
that is 120% of its actual value. But by doing so, it ensures that the members
of the group are closer to their perception of the absolute.
|
|
s |
μ |
Absolute Zero |
100% |
Absolute |
Perceived |
Young Ward |
0.070 |
NA |
|
0.45 |
41% |
Voter |
0.288 |
NA |
0.041 |
0.86 |
90% |
|
Leader |
0.459 |
NA |
(0.042) |
1.22 |
144% |
|
Advisor |
0.288 |
NA |
(0.221) |
1.04 |
90% |
|
Old Ward |
0.070 |
NA |
0.142 |
0.96 |
41% |
|
User Optimal |
NA |
0.000 |
1.500 |
NA |
NA |
|
System Optimal |
0.250 |
NA |
0.500 |
2.91 |
100% |
|
Nash Equilibrium |
0.500 |
1.885 |
0.023 |
2.91 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Absolute |
0.500 |
1.571 |
0.000 |
3.142 |
100% |
Individuals acting as a group perceive the absolute from
their own frame of reference, hyperspace. By acting as if the Absolute is more
than what can be perceived, the group can better match their perception of absolute.
But the values in the table for leaders are only the
average of all those who could be leaders, not those individuals who are actually
chosen as leaders. Individuals within the group of leaders are just as subject
to error as anyone else. And even leaders are better at only the range of the absolute,
not the Absolute itself. The current allies in MAGA of User Optimalists and System Optimalists don’t come close to the the Absolute. That is reserved for Nash Equilibriumists. Even the common sense of leaders is NOT very
common, and it definitely is not absolute.
No comments:
Post a Comment